This further casts doubts on the true personality of Arthur. Calculations show that this happened 300 years before the dates usually quoted for Arthur’s time. He fought a war against some northern tribes in Scotland during the 2nd century. In other theories, Arthur has been linked to a Roman army officer called Lucius Artorius. So far, many historians think it is more convincing to simply view Arthur as a man who led Britons to conquer an invading force of Saxons and other European enemies during the 5th and 6th centuries AD. Again, he would have existed for over 500 years ahead of the medieval legends. First of all, if Arthur really existed as a war hero, he would have been a commander of an army not a king. The few scholars who support the real existence of Arthur always have some factors to consider. King Arthur is widely regarded as a mythical and legendary character, although there have been contrary supportive claims that Arthur was a real king.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |